X-GM-THRID: 1201055461813100488 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: da3a8abcb8b1e0fd173786db36f4e6a7b6073fcc Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.70.6 with SMTP id s6cs32659wra; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.27.1 with SMTP id e1mr787498nfj; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id n23si303124nfc.2006.04.21.15.26.32; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FX41Y-0002WH-R3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:22:48 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FX41Y-0002W8-BB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:22:48 +0100 Received: from imo-m22.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.3] helo=imo-m22.mail.aol.com) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FX5M6-0007xf-4h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 00:48:07 +0100 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id l.3b1.110d582 (1320) for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:22:36 -0400 (EDT) From: MarkusVester@aol.com Message-ID: <3b1.110d582.317ab52b@aol.com> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:22:35 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6104 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.143,HTML_40_50=0.086,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_3b1.110d582.317ab52b_boundary" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6448 --part1_3b1.110d582.317ab52b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jay, counting pixels ... well I guess the other station is on 18.6 kHz not 18.5.=20 Can you see something there? There are several US transmitters listed as=20 "inactive" on this QRG.=20 73 de Markus In einer eMail vom 21.04.2006 01:12:02 Westeurop=E4ische Sommerzeit schreibt= =20 JRusgrove@comcast.net:=20 > How accurate are the WWLLN frequency scales? In particular does 18.5 fall=20 > on 18.5?=20 --part1_3b1.110d582.317ab52b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jay,

counting pixels ... well I guess the other station is on 18.6 kHz not 18.5.=20= Can you see something there? There are several US transmitters listed as "in= active" on this QRG.

73 de Markus

In einer eMail vom 21.04.2006 01:12:02 Westeurop=E4ische Sommerzeit schreibt= JRusgrove@comcast.net:

How accurate are the WWLLN freq= uency scales? In particular does 18.5 fall on 18.5?


--part1_3b1.110d582.317ab52b_boundary--