X-GM-THRID: 1199539128024826135
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
X-Gmail-Received: 871fc284b3d2eb55c27a1818e4a5b88003554c96
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.54.127.8 with SMTP id z8cs13405wrc;
        Sun, 2 Apr 2006 09:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.244.12 with SMTP id r12mr320341nfh;
        Sun, 02 Apr 2006 09:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h1si1327959nfe.2006.04.02.09.27.19;
        Sun, 02 Apr 2006 09:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1FQ5OF-0002lR-Aa
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 17:25:23 +0100
Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1FQ5OE-0002lI-O4
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 17:25:22 +0100
Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net ([194.159.73.192])
	by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1FQ6ZO-0004Gp-Cq
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:40:59 +0100
Received: from ndb.demon.nl ([82.161.81.65]:11462 helo=pcroelof)
	by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1FQ5OC-0006vy-Tq
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 16:25:21 +0000
Message-ID: <003401c65672$039ae0a0$2201a8c0@pcroelof>
From: "Roelof Bakker" <roelof@ndb.demon.nl>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <000401c64b6e$33e2b8a0$3bcdfc3e@your4105e587b6> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0604020823430.8703@comcon2.org> <003601c65636$5fc1ffd0$2201a8c0@pcroelof> <Pine.OSF.4.56.0604021036080.26254@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:25:11 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.524
Subject: Re: LF: T/A April 2
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="Windows-1252";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 5936

Hello Joe,

A few days ago you mailed that you have been using a mini-whip portable.
And also that you noticed overload problems in the vicinity of MW broadcast 
transmitters.

I wonder if the overload originates in the mini-whip or in the receiver.
This can be verified by a simple test. Connect an attenuator between the 
mini-whip and the receiver. If the overload problems disappear with 10 or 20 
dB attenuation, the receiver is the culprit. If not, the mini-whip is at 
fault.

By the way, which receiver have you been using?

73

Roelof