X-GM-THRID: 1201055461813100488 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: ac58ada14a938c2a1cbc3f822e20591494f0032a Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.70.6 with SMTP id s6cs4422wra; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.64.16 with SMTP id r16mr854396nfk; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id y24si1368024nfb.2006.04.20.16.15.06; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FWiIz-000879-Bs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:11:21 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FWiIy-000870-Re for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:11:20 +0100 Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net ([63.240.77.84]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FWk5x-0003di-Ki for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:06:17 +0100 Received: from AIRPORTTERMINAL (c-71-234-114-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net[71.234.114.84]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with SMTP id <20060420231053014005t562e>; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:10:58 +0000 Message-ID: <001b01c664cf$3c72c440$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> From: "Jay Rusgrove" To: References: <3b1.e9bd3b.31796b0b@aol.com> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:07:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.048,HTML_50_60=0.095,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01C664AD.B233D920" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6450 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C664AD.B233D920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markus How accurate are the WWLLN frequency scales? In particular does 18.5 = fall on 18.5? Was sorry to see them go off yesterday morning ;~( Was = hoping to get a look at them during the daytime. Jay ----- Original Message -----=20 From: MarkusVester@aol.com=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 6:54 PM Subject: Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in CT Hi Jos=E9, no, not really a cardioid. The cardioid symbol appears in SpecLab's = RDF scale because I sometimes use the directional null function to = mitigate green bands from a certain switched-mode power supply. This one = is much stronger on the loops than on the E-field antenna, and I can = minimize it by adding in a small portion of the H-field channel in = antiphase (H/E-weighting =3D 0.2). For far field reception, this does = create a small 20% asymmetry in the directional pattern. Re the original subject line: The test transmissions from DHO38 18.5 = kHz ceased yesterday morning 07:00. However some of the WWLLN = spectrograms, mostly from the pacific area, still show another FSK = signal on that frequency. I couldn't find this one in the station = listings, does anyone know what it is? 73 and all the best Markus In einer eMail vom 20.04.2006 23:05:43 Westeurop=E4ische Sommerzeit = schreibt jpradoes@telefonica.net:=20 Markus , does your Grabber have a cardiod receiving pattern? ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C664AD.B233D920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Markus
 
How accurate are the WWLLN frequency = scales? In=20 particular does 18.5 fall on 18.5? Was sorry to see them go off = yesterday=20 morning ;~(   Was hoping to get a look at them during the=20 daytime.
 
Jay
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 MarkusVester@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 = 6:54=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 18.5 kHz in = CT

Hi Jos=E9,

no, not really a = cardioid. The=20 cardioid symbol appears in SpecLab's RDF scale because I sometimes use = the=20 directional null function to mitigate green bands from a certain = switched-mode=20 power supply. This one is much stronger on the loops than on the = E-field=20 antenna, and I can minimize it by adding in a small portion of the = H-field=20 channel in antiphase (H/E-weighting =3D 0.2). For far field reception, = this does=20 create a small 20% asymmetry in the directional pattern.

Re the = original subject line: The test transmissions from DHO38 18.5 kHz = ceased=20 yesterday morning 07:00. However some of the WWLLN spectrograms, = mostly from=20 the pacific area, still show another FSK signal on that frequency. I = couldn't=20 find this one in the station listings, does anyone know what it = is?

73=20 and all the best
Markus

In einer eMail vom 20.04.2006 = 23:05:43=20 Westeurop=E4ische Sommerzeit schreibt jpradoes@telefonica.net: =

Markus , does your Grabber have a cardiod receiving=20 pattern?
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C664AD.B233D920--