Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
From: "Dave G3WCB" <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:31:13 -0000
Message-ID: <PAEFLMFGBDKKCONLMLBIKEOMCFAA.ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <000401c63d4a$fdf2cd60$2eccfc3e@your4105e587b6>
Importance: Normal
Subject: LF: EI0CF - LF beacon off-air
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O


The following from the ndblist regarding EI0CF.... :-(


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Finbar" <beachwood@eircom.net>
To: "ndblist" <ndblist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:56 AM
Subject: [ndblist] re LF beacon off-air


> 
> Please be advised that my LF beacon on
> 136.36 khz has now been taken off the air.
> The transmitter was switched off at  0950 utc
> on the 28th Feb.
> Thanks to all those who reported or relayed
> reports of others, together with screen shots
> etc.  All very informative indeed.
> I have spoken/e-mailed to a number of people
> regarding this test transmission and it is
> with regret that I note that band conditions
> appear to have gone down quite a bit since I
> first started on LF on 136 khz back in 1998.
> 
> In large parts of the UK, transmissions of
> Loran from the Rugby transmitter, together with
> the obvious large increase in electronics,
> data and broadband connections seem to have 
> raised the noise floor in this area of frequency
> quite a bit.
> 
> I would think this will be my final experiment
> on LF, interesting from a technical point of view
> but highly disruptive to what I do most of the 
> time nowadays.....listening.
> 
> Thank you again for all the reports.
> Finbar O'Connor   EI0CF   Malin
> 
> 
>