X-GM-THRID: 1196684404245296047 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 4cbc10edf03b25716f048ea5202d54b675cf2d20 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.71.12 with SMTP id t12cs13759wra; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:14:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.10.16 with SMTP id n16mr626223ugi; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 12:14:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id j2si1895886ugf.2006.03.02.12.14.44; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 12:14:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FEuA6-0006pp-Q9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:12:34 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FEuA6-0006pg-8D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:12:34 +0000 Received: from smtp-out04.alice.it ([85.37.17.100] helo=out4.alice.it) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FEvec-0001Yw-Af for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:48:29 +0000 Received: from FBCMMO02.fbc.local ([192.168.68.196]) by out4.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:11:14 +0100 Received: from client.alice.it ([192.168.68.141]) by FBCMMO02.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:11:13 +0100 Received: from ideq200s.spin-it.com ([87.30.69.168]) by client.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:11:13 +0100 Message-Id: <7.0.0.10.2.20060302210859.039b6c10@spin-it.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.0.10 (Beta) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:11:36 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Marco Bruno In-Reply-To: <003a01c63e33$08290cc0$67b0fea9@lark> References: <01cd01c63d73$69bc4f80$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <4407287F.8000306@freenet.de> <029801c63e22$bb20b190$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <003a01c63e33$08290cc0$67b0fea9@lark> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2006 20:11:13.0326 (UTC) FILETIME=[745FC4E0:01C63E35] X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=ham,BAYES_00=-2.599 Subject: Re: LF: LORAN spurious emission levels Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6238 At 20.53 02/03/2006, you wrote: >Peter have you looked at the "megapulse" web site for power levels. ERPs may >be calculatable if we know the mast heights....these may be available >elsewhere. >http://www.megapulse.com/chaininfo.html > >Lessay and Sylt are quoted as 250kW, there are even powers for the western >Chayka system ! Exact locations are also given. > >Also at a lot of locations you will receive signals from more than one >station maybe from different chains....will this affect you calculations? or >the sensitivity idea. I suppose there will generally be one main site, the >nearest, which will predominate ? Hi all, the only station that I have been inside (Sellia Marina, southern Italy) had a 300m mast and was running 100kW pulse power. From info that I had from the Navy guys there, it was a standard mast for Loran-C TX. 73 - Marco IK1ODO