Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <4426F008.4010407@freenet.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:48:24 +0000
From: Wolf DL4YHF <dl4yhf@freenet.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFAEJPCLAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <NKEMLGOEKANPNJOBFBAFAEJPCLAA.g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: LF: HELL CQ - Who?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Gary,
Well you may try a Hell variant which doesn't require a linear TX:  
"Sequential" multitone Hell. The tone has always the same amplitude, and 
it simply hops between the frequencies to form the dots of a character. 
It doesn't look as good as Markus' Chirped Hell, but it works. The mode 
is implemented in SL, and in other dedicated Hell programs.

I still have the remotely controlled station running (home again, in my 
easy chair..) but I don't dare to transmit now because the only 
"monitor" I have is a receiver. I cannot see how good (or bad) the SWR 
is, and I don't have a webcam to check for smoke ;-)

G3WCB is very nice copy (at DK4U) at this very moment, but not 
decipherable with my indoor antenna (at DL4YHF).

Will let the system running for John's WOLF tonight, hoping the 
WLAN-audio link from DK4U to my home QTH doesn't brake down.

Best regards,
  Wolf  DL4YHF .


Gary - G4WGT schrieb:

>Hi Wolf,
>
>Did not get chance for further activity on 136 due to family matters but
>very interested to read about your remote operating.
>It would be good to get into HELL but I don't believe the G0MRF Tx (class D)
>is suitable. I will keep looking & report any activity I see.
>
>Regards,
>
>Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp
>
>Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>Yes it was me, operating REMOTELY
>
>
>
>  
>