X-GM-THRID: 1198588554218267222 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 17a20cd9bd2728cebca6ff67c9043e27d5cfe715 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.8 with SMTP id z8cs3331wrc; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:09:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.158.4 with SMTP id k4mr1405902qbo; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:09:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id p4si319411qba.2006.03.23.00.09.17; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:09:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FMKoD-0003Yo-Qs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:04:41 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FMKoD-0003Yf-GR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:04:41 +0000 Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48] helo=mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FMMQQ-0005T5-SP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:48:33 +0000 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060323080417.WQLV29040.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:04:17 +0000 Received: from mikedennison ([82.10.67.170]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060323080417.MRNG9667.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@mikedennison> for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:04:17 +0000 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:04:12 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4422567C.31698.2DD2B2@localhost> In-reply-to: <000d01c64df6$8e8aea40$2102000a@ibm> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.241,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: Re: LF: portable DX-pedition antenna? Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6323 I have found a kite to be very effective, but it is dependent on wind speeds, so you need a back-up. Mike, G3XDV ========== > Any suggestions for a DX-pedition antenna which is easy to built up, > and as efficient as possible? Should be capable of withstanding 1kW. > > 73 > > Dick, PA4VHF (LX/PA6Z..........) > > > >