X-GM-THRID: 1198355290992054187 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 136009f2690d5de34d35bfca3a9fa90b035c7760 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.8 with SMTP id z8cs21541wrc; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:44:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.240.19 with SMTP id s19mr600268qbr; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:44:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id f14si1502243qba.2006.03.20.12.44.29; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:44:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FLRCc-0001ym-GV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:42:10 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FLRCc-0001yd-1g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:42:10 +0000 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([216.148.227.151]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FLSns-0001to-Gt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:25:04 +0000 Received: from rmailcenter07.comcast.net ([204.127.197.117]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20060320204141m1100cahdte>; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:41:41 +0000 Received: from [24.91.21.104] by rmailcenter07.comcast.net; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:41:40 +0000 From: k2ors@comcast.net (Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: "John RABSON" Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:41:40 +0000 Message-Id: <032020062041.10662.441F1383000DAE35000029A622007340760B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Aug 4 2005) X-Authenticated-Sender: bWFyeWphbmVib3lkQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.917 Subject: Re: LF: Decca SG X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6157 Hi Jason, I think what Costas was getting at is that the 6L6 was the grand daddy of all beam power tetrodes including the 807, 6146 etc. Yes the 807 has higher voltage and frequency rating than the 6L6 but both valves share a common architecture. -- 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ FN42hi http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "John RABSON" > >Yes, the 807 is more-or-less an 6L6 with different > >connections. > > > >Costas SV1XV > > I'm not sure I agree with this. My Wireless World valve data book from the late > 1950s describes the 6L6 as an (audio) output beam tetrode rated for 300V on the > anode, 200V on the screen, and delivering about 6W output. > > The same book quotes the 807 as accepting up to 600V on the anode, 250V on the > screen and being able to deliver up to 40W RF at up to 60MHz. > > I recall reading in the RSGB Bulletin of old-timer who ran 110W to a single 807 > using on-off keying and with 1kV on the anode. He said the important thing was > to keep the screen dissipation low. I am not sure a 6L6 would do as well. > > 73, > John G3PAI > > > >