X-GM-THRID: 1197297461353684089 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 5c792421d58b3b6003d480cfeb5e7fbdc5ddb031 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.71.12 with SMTP id t12cs1220wra; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:49:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.24.19 with SMTP id b19mr873066ugj; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:49:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q1si158197uge.2006.03.08.18.49.29; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FHBAU-0006lQ-1v for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:46:22 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FHBAT-0006lH-Lt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:46:21 +0000 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([216.148.227.153]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FHChL-0001OS-7y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 04:24:42 +0000 Received: from rmailcenter89.comcast.net ([204.127.197.189]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <20060309024544m13001s5b3e>; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 02:45:55 +0000 Received: from [24.91.21.104] by rmailcenter89.comcast.net; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:45:43 +0000 From: k2ors@comcast.net (Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, Cc: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:45:43 +0000 Message-Id: <030920060245.1848.440F96D7000387690000073822092246270B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Aug 4 2005) X-Authenticated-Sender: bWFyeWphbmVib3lkQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=ham,AWL=0.212,BAYES_00=-2.599 Subject: Re: LF: Re: ARGO or SPECTRAN? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6194 Alan, John, and J.B. Thanks for the comments on the pros and cons of Argo, Spectran and Spectrum Lab. -- 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ FN42hi http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ" > To: "rsgb lf reflector" > Cc: "LWCA LF Reflector" > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 2:59 PM > Subject: LF: ARGO or SPECTRAN? > > > > Hello the list, > > > > I have been using Spectran for my QRSS receiving, mostly out of habit. > > > > > Am I missing something by using Spectran instead of Argo? > > > > 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ > > FN42hi > > http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm > > > > Hi Warren, > > Since all I can do so far is receive, I thought I'd throw my 2 cents worth > in on this. I use both Argo and Spectrum Lab for my QRSS listening, > and I like both of them. Argo shines in its simplicity to configure and in > the ease of use, once you've loaded a few favourite settings into it. Not > having a lot of fancy bells and whistles means it's pretty hard to mess up > anything. Spectrum Lab does have one ability that I really like in that I > can change the range of frequency that I want to watch without having > an effect on the mode. For instance I can set an upper and lower pair > of frequencies to establish a range while watching QRSS30, then make > a change to that range on the fly without other effects. I find that one > feature quite handy. As one of the others on the list mentioned, it all > boils down to which one you're comfortable with and how it does > what you want of it. > > 73, J.B., VE3EAR - VE3WZL > Solar and wind powered > EN93dr > > >