X-GM-THRID: 1197372432254830510
X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf
X-Gmail-Received: efb6aea6d9c0ddd75f10d1fc65f7e1320f02ff7f
Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com
Received: by 10.54.71.12 with SMTP id t12cs4176wra;
        Thu, 9 Mar 2006 03:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.122.5 with SMTP id z5mr976063qbm;
        Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e16si541590qbe.2006.03.09.03.22.14;
        Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1FHJBk-0000d6-NE
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:20:12 +0000
Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1FHJBk-0000cx-8q
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:20:12 +0000
Received: from smtp803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.140])
	by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1FHKB5-0008Se-5t
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:23:36 +0000
Received: (qmail 80670 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2006 11:20:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO LAPTOP) (peter.martinez@btinternet.com@81.159.70.251 with login)
  by smtp803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2006 11:20:10 -0000
Message-ID: <028f01c6436b$6d607f00$0300a8c0@LAPTOP>
From: "Peter Martinez" <peter.martinez@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <8bf118410603071038x69f0b6b2h@mail.gmail.com> <1319435101.20060307194818@t-online.de> <8bf118410603071124o660d5be7u@mail.gmail.com> <200603072124500021.0CA05364@smtp.wanadoo.fr> <200603080945000253.000AA657@smtp.wanadoo.fr> <00b401c64295$0c575c50$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> <200603091140550025.00829489@smtp.wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 11:19:59 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=0.219,BAYES_00=-2.599
Subject: LF: Galloping Horses
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 6484

John:

By all means quote my explanation, but it's not an explanation which should 
be attributed to me, since the reason behind it has been known since LORAN 
began.  It only applies to LORAN transmitters like Lessay and Sylt which are 
'dual rated', that is, which have two distinct pulse repetition rates. Rugby 
and Soustons (SW France), for example, don't gallop.

The term 'Galloping Horses' has also been around for a while. UK stations 
were certainly using it in 1998 when the LORAN problem first reared it's 
ugly head on 136kHz.

73
Peter