Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:57:00 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4KLs-0003pQ-0j for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:57:00 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4KLr-0003oh-PO for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:56:59 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F4KLi-0002WR-7z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:56:50 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F4KLh-0002WI-M2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:56:49 +0000 Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.82]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F4L3Z-0000ep-6S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:42:10 +0000 Received: from fwd27.aul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1F4KLf-0007rn-02; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:56:47 +0100 Received: from dl4eau (rw8sJkZaYe8f5YF0ULlZumYTinr7DPOBFzpXozeOm0wK8e22QHXcE7@[217.245.118.146]) by fwd27.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 1F4KKs-08BcHY0; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:55:58 +0100 From: "Thomas Eckart" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:55:49 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <002101c62744$4a617c40$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> Importance: Normal X-ID: rw8sJkZaYe8f5YF0ULlZumYTinr7DPOBFzpXozeOm0wK8e22QHXcE7 X-TOI-MSGID: 7a30a374-d231-4da9-9211-48f776762fad Subject: LF: AW: Re: LF TA Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Hi Jay,
ok and thanks for response to my question.
So I think I'll use the 136319.5 khz for test.
 
Best 73' hope that you will see me! :-)
 
Tom DL4EAU
 
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Im Auftrag von Jay Rusgrove
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 16:29
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: LF: Re: LF TA

Tom
 
136319 or 136320 should be fine here in terms of no interference - the closest loran line is at 320.3 and will not be a problem. Don't know if anyone has already spoken for those frequencies, though.
 
Jay, W1VD
----- Original Message -----
From: DL4EAU@t-online.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 6:56 AM
Subject: LF: LF TA

Hi all,

I want to test TA this night.
What is a good frequency?
Is 136.319KHz or 136.320KHz a good choice?

I have made a test this morning. At 04:20h UTC I TX only one EAU in
QRSS30

73' Tom DL4EAU