Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:25:52 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1FBe52-00043l-7m for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:25:52 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1FBe52-00042I-4a for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:25:52 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FBe4i-0006Vx-Fl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:25:32 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FBe4i-0006Vo-4a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:25:32 +0000 Received: from smtpout09-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.17]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FBfVt-0003h7-UJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:57:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 3941 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2006 20:25:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (208.37.242.34) by smtpout09-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.17) with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2006 20:25:04 -0000 Message-ID: <43FB785C.8020409@w1tag.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:30:20 -0500 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: XES Carrier tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Thanks for the reports on the "dead carrier" last night. I've had a request to repeat it again tonight, so XES will be back on 137.57730950601398944854736328125 kHz again, starting at 2230 UTC. The CW ID is at 30 minute intervals, and should be rather exactly at the top and bottom of the hour. The next step will be to send a little repeating PSK message, probably with 2-min/bit timing. Details tomorrow. Markus: Special thanks for your analysis thus far. One obvious issue is the phase stability of this sort of path, and the information will be useful. Am very interested to see any results from last night's unkeyed run. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES