Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:04:13 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F69mf-0004Tu-D8 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:04:13 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F69mf-0004TZ-4s for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:04:13 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F69mT-0002zh-ER for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:04:01 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F69mT-0002zX-2A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:04:01 +0000 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([194.97.50.131]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F6B7z-0003Hh-Oo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:30:35 +0000 Received: from [194.97.50.138] (helo=mx0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1F69lr-0004r7-Mf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:03:23 +0100 Received: from p54868e49.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.134.142.73] helo=[192.168.0.200]) by mx0.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.61 #21) id 1F69lr-0003q8-DJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:03:23 +0100 Message-ID: <43E7815C.4080206@freenet.de> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:03:24 +0000 From: Wolf DL4YHF User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001c62b1d$0cf35f40$e6a4c593@RD40002> In-Reply-To: <000001c62b1d$0cf35f40$e6a4c593@RD40002> Subject: Re: LF: Re: More smoke... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Greetings all, Jim wrote: > Power MOSFETs work like big zener diodes anyway – if you exceed the > drain-source breakdown voltage, avalanche occurs and the voltage is > clamped, usually about 20 – 40% above the BVdss value (60V in this > case). This does not harm the MOSFET directly, but does result in high > power dissipation – if breakdown occurs at 80V, and the clamping > current is 10A, 800W will be dissipated. This is OK if it only occurs > during short, infrequent voltage “spikes”, but if the high voltage > transients occur with a large duty cycle, the MOSFET will quickly > overheat. It might be possible to connect high-power zeners across the > MOSFET with a slightly lower breakdown voltage than the MOSFETs, but > then the problem would be how to protect the zeners! > > Instead of super-duper zeners, you may as well use fast switching diodes to protect the MOSFET. Use these diodes to discharge excessive drain voltage into an electrolytic cap. Next, use a cheap 2N3055 or similar, and a low-power zener diode, to limit the maximum voltage on the capacitor. You may even measure the voltage as a tuning indicator - it acts as a peak-detector. (you may even use that "high-DC voltage" for something more useful: a crude switching-mode step-down converter to feed it back into the power supply :o) Regards, Wolf DL4YHF.