Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:10:55 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4nbK-0004F9-De for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:10:55 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4nbK-0004Eq-76 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:10:54 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F4nbD-0007aQ-FK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:10:47 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F4nbC-0007aH-W1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:10:46 +0000 Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.152]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F4ovH-0005kz-Ao for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:35:54 +0000 Received: from rmailcenter05.comcast.net ([204.127.197.115]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <20060202231020m12007it0re>; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:10:20 +0000 Received: from [24.91.21.104] by rmailcenter05.comcast.net; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:10:18 +0000 From: Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:10:18 +0000 Message-Id: <020220062310.23359.43E2915A00063CBB00005B3F22007358340B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Aug 4 2005) X-Authenticated-Sender: bWFyeWphbmVib3lkQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Keeping the smoke in Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hi Mike, I don't think that the cores were damaged from the last incident. I was able to run the 250 watt transmitter through it with no problem and no measureable reflected power. I understand that Laurence also used 3 stacked FT-290-77s but actively cooled it. A cooling fan is not easy to do in my case since the tuner is in a weathertight box. -- 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ FN42hi http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "MIKE REID" > What cores did Laurence use and what wire size & type? Sorry to hear she failed > again. Maybe the cores got damaged the other day with no external indications > like cracking or? I don't recall you having trouble with the transformer when it > was dry and Teflon is way better than cotton so that leads me to think the cores > were no good after the first heat cycle/failure. > > Mike > WE0H > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ > To: rsgb lf reflector > Cc: LWCA LF Reflector > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 4:41 PM > Subject: LF: Keeping the smoke in > > > Hello the list, > > I've heard that the secret to keeping things going in electronics is to > make sure you don't let the smoke out (that's what makes it all work > apparently). > > I have again failed to do so. After rewinding my toroidal loop > transformer in the ATU, I had a core overheating problem. The core is 3 stacked > FT-290-77 ferrites. > After setting the Decca up on QRSS for an hour or so I noticed a problem with > the rf output current, it was pulsing up and down as if the Decca guard circuit > was cutting in to protect the PA. So I through the breaker and went out and > opened the tuner box. Smoke poured out. Bad news. I checked the temperatures > with a non-contact infra-red thermometer and the toroid core was 343 Farenheit. > The Curie temperature for type 77 ferrite is 200 C (which is 392 Farenheit). > Not sure yet if the core is permanently damaged, I'm still waiting for it to > cool down. > > All credit to Laurence who managed to get a loop to work at this power > level! And especially with the currents he dealt with in the parallel wire loop > configuration. > > I guess I need a bigger core than the 3 stacked FT-290-77s any suggestions > out there? > > -- > 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ > FN42hi > http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm > >