Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:14:10 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4JgL-0006jM-0L for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:14:09 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F4JgK-0006WA-Re for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:14:04 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F4Jfr-000241-7O for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:13:35 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F4Jfq-00023s-Ol for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:13:34 +0000 Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([63.240.77.83]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F4KNh-0000MS-Bw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:58:54 +0000 Received: from AIRPORTTERMINAL (c-67-177-102-19.hsd1.ct.comcast.net[67.177.102.19]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <20060201151249013002m4jre>; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:12:49 +0000 Message-ID: <002101c62744$4a617c40$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> From: "Jay Rusgrove" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <020120060225.29276.43E01C11000B4FD10000725C22064244130B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> <001001c62721$6fa49960$67b0fea9@lark> <1F4GbI-0CTncm0@fwd33.aul.t-online.de> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:29:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: LF: Re: LF TA Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Tom
 
136319 or 136320 should be fine here in terms of no interference - the closest loran line is at 320.3 and will not be a problem. Don't know if anyone has already spoken for those frequencies, though.
 
Jay, W1VD
----- Original Message -----
From: DL4EAU@t-online.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 6:56 AM
Subject: LF: LF TA

Hi all,

I want to test TA this night.
What is a good frequency?
Is 136.319KHz or 136.320KHz a good choice?

I have made a test this morning. At 04:20h UTC I TX only one EAU in
QRSS30

73' Tom DL4EAU