Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:55:16 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1FCi60-0002jU-AB for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:55:16 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1FCi60-0002jD-5l for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:55:16 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FCi5l-0000Hf-Ir for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:55:01 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FCi5l-0000HW-87 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:55:01 +0000 Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net ([194.159.73.193]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FCjY4-0005XB-So for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:28:35 +0000 Received: from ndb.demon.nl ([82.161.81.65]:13315 helo=pcroelof) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FCi5V-0009Zk-KF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:54:45 +0000 Message-ID: <000601c63973$c337bcb0$2201a8c0@pcroelof> From: "Roelof Bakker" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001101c638cb$1febc720$0100a8c0@jpmpcportable> <000c01c63920$104f7fa0$0100a8c0@jpmpcportable> <000d01c63972$4b4b0320$2201a8c0@pcroelof> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:54:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: LF: Re: TA 24-02-2006: VO1NA only Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hello all, >> On the first the trace << This should be read as : "On the second" Best regards, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt