Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:49:21 +0000
Message-ID: <000501c629dc$c7131ba0$eb7b8351@w4o8m9>
From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000701c62720$be51b3a0$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL><1246025403.20060201202249@dx.ru> <1941044238.20060201210259@dx.ru><486075040.20060202130106@dx.ru> <669656179.20060203124044@dx.ru> <002f01c62991$0082b2c0$a1558351@w4o8m9> <001701c629bc$0cebac80$5d3c8351@w4o8m9> <002901c629cb$e6e97fc0$5d3c8351@w4o8m9>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:46:03 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: HF_MF2LF #1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Dear Ed, LF Group,

I checked all the screen shots taken from 1400 - 2200utc, but unfortunately
no recognisable signals from RU6LA in the 136kHz band were detectable.
CT1DRP was visible at the beginning and end of the period, also a quite
strong but unidentified signal just above 136.318kHz appeared a couple of
times. The QRN level was quite high after about 1700 here. I was able to
copy all the HF signals from RU6LA, check the frequencies, and set the LF RX
frequency accordingly, so I'm confident if there was a signal to be seen, it
would have been on the screen. So, for the time being at least, it seems the
best way of transmitting a signal on 136k is to use an LF transmitter :-)
Thanks for running an interesting experiment,

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU