Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:08:35 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F3yzY-0007a8-Sl for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:08:35 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F3yzY-0007Yz-ML for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:08:32 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F3yzF-0005BK-40 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:08:13 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F3yzE-0005BB-O5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:08:12 +0000 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([194.97.50.155]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F40IT-0003x5-Qu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:32:28 +0000 Received: from [194.97.55.242] (helo=mx9.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1F3yyv-0007fc-S6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:07:53 +0100 Received: from p5486af4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.134.175.79] helo=[192.168.0.200]) by mx9.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.61 #21) id 1F3yyv-0007xI-MC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:07:53 +0100 Message-ID: <43DF9979.8030105@freenet.de> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:08:09 +0000 From: Wolf DL4YHF User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003901c62682$55767b70$0a8cf8d4@standalone> In-Reply-To: <003901c62682$55767b70$0a8cf8d4@standalone> Subject: Re: LF: T/A JAN 31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Greetings all... Andy wrote: >A professional programmer who spent somef time working on waterfall palettes >for signal analysis once suggested that, it order to see signals separated >from the background by only a small amount, a waterfall should change >brightness rapidly and colour more slowly, even if some brightness levels >repeat over the dynamic range. Working on the basis that most interest is >in weak signal resolution, and stong ones can be left to fend for >themselves, he suggested a palette that ran from dark blue, through red to >yellow then back via green and orange to black. (Or other variants like >this) . A bit weird but brightness as perceived by the eye is then peaked >part way up the signal range. > >The dark blue could then be placed at the noise level, so the normal noise >spikes averaging 2 - 4dB above mean, say, would push towards red (also a >dark colour), but signals at 6 - 10dB S/N would show clearly as bright >centre optical-spectrum green/yellow. Really strong sigs would be >orange/black but would not be hidden as they'd have brightly coloured >sidebands making them stand out against their own background. I never tried >it - but may do now the idea has been awakened. > >Andy G4JNT >www.scrbg.org/g4jnt/ > > > Thanks Andy - any volunteer among the SpecLab users who already realized this with the colour palette editor ? If so, I'd like to add it in the next release so others can try it out too ;-) 73, Wolf DL4YHF .