Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:57 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F2sC4-0000Mb-AG for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:57 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F2sC3-0000Kx-O4 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:52 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F2sBF-0007LT-Gm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:01 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F2sBE-0007LF-Se for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:40:00 +0000 Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.117]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F2sr8-0007N9-3H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:23:20 +0000 Received: from [10.0.252.126] (166-82-181-2.stanlynet.org[166.82.181.2]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060128153916113006000le>; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:39:16 +0000 Message-ID: <43DB9022.4000301@att.net> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:39:14 +0000 From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: LF: Who is WD2XXK? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Gary - G4WGT wrote: >Dex & Roelof, > >I have an overnite capture from 0240z to 0340z showing very clearly D2XXK >just above VO1NA. > > > It sure looks like I'm guilty :( What little defense evidence I had was erased this morning when I changed modes and reprogrammed the keying computer. At first I thought maybe the amp over current was tripping out causing the QRSS elements to show dots instead of dashes. But I don't see any way that could have caused XKO to look like XXK. The only person that could possibly prove my innocents in this case would be Johnny Cochran. And he isn't taking on any more clients. Dex