Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:18:19 +0000
Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Ex4DR-0006FS-Dl 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:18:19 +0000
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	  by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Ex4DR-0006EY-A9 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:18:17 +0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Ex4D7-0001ck-1C
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:17:57 +0000
Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Ex4D6-0001cb-KB
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:17:56 +0000
Received: from smtpout02-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.194])
	by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1Ex4lB-0007js-2k
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:53:11 +0000
Received: (qmail 15443 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 15:16:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (208.37.242.34)
  by smtpout02-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.194) with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2006 15:16:49 -0000
Message-ID: <43C6733D.6080104@w1tag.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:18:21 -0500
From: John Andrews <w1tag@w1tag.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <20060112155617.70o4s9ervhwc8ooo@webmail.versatel.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060112155617.70o4s9ervhwc8ooo@webmail.versatel.de>
Subject: Re: LF: TA 12 JAN 06
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00)

Uwe,

I would expect our local conditions to be much better tonight. We are 
then expecting rain on Friday and Saturday nights, but it's unclear 
whether the storm will have lightning. We keep getting these offshore 
storms that are fairly severe out over the water, and close enough for 
the noise to affect our reception.

John A.

uwe-jannsen@versanet.de wrote:

> Zitat von Jay Rusgrove <JRusgrove@comcast.net>:
>
>> Local thunderstorms...very little copy. Occasional bright spots
>> indicates propagation may have been good. One meager capture:
>>
>> http://www.w1vd.com/gallery2006.html
>>
>> Jay, W1VD
>>
>>
>>
>
> Thanks Jay, thanks John,
>
> vy "meager" results using 700W output, ie abt 0,9W ERP. 800W LF output 
> would be
> the next step. but
> 1. FS measurements using the equipment of our Radio Control Station
>   (Bundesnetzagentur) located in my vicinity showed that 800W output 
> means
>   a few mW more than 1W ERP
> 2. I guess it doesnt help making the step from "meager" to "fat" on 
> your screen.
>
> Regards
> Uwe/dj8wx
>
>
>
>