Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:08:18 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Evyd7-0001hq-CY for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:08:17 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Evyd7-0001hM-8Y for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:08:17 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1EvycO-0008PV-Kb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:07:32 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1EvycO-0008PM-6H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:07:32 +0000 Received: from smtp14.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.23.69]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Evz90-00062e-P6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:41:15 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1409.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0E4807000116 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:07:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from john-b5a82ea1a4 (Mix-Dijon-116-2-211.w193-250.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.250.133.211]) by mwinf1409.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2BB5B700010C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:07:14 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20060109150714179.2BB5B700010C@mwinf1409.wanadoo.fr Message-ID: <200601091607080165.00437105@smtp.wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <002401c612f0$3ea835a0$67b0fea9@lark> References: <60.64c0679e.30f00b8e@aol.com> <002401c612f0$3ea835a0$67b0fea9@lark> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (K) Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:07:08 +0100 From: "John RABSON" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re[4]: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) The other reason for a dearth of international activity on top band 40 years ago was that much of the USA did not have a top band allocation. I can't be specific as my copy of the ARRL handbook for the era has disappeared. 73 John G3PAI *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 06/01/2006 at 18:37 Alan Melia wrote: >Hi John what a difference, in the UK top band was the 2m of its day. >Whilst there were a few the DXers, it was used a lot for local chatting >(AM of course) and inter-G activity. The only other country in Europe >licenced for it them was OK. We were limited to 10watts DC input in the >late 50s and 60s.....great fun....easy construction (well compared with >2m) ..... I learned a lot of radio playing up there. > >Yes Loran-A sterilized a portion of the band between about 1920 and 1980 >in the UK, but a good noise limiter could be quite useful. > >Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: WarmSpgs@aol.com > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: 06 January 2006 18:06 > Subject: Re: Re[2]: LF: Loran Line or U.S. MedFER? > > > > ...multiple bandsaws fading in and out with their relative phases >wobbling around like the efforts of a not very good disco DJ. > > Excellent description, John! And a rather slow disco DJ, at that. > > Here, I believe the frequency span was roughly 1700 to 1900. One could >often hear them with an AM broadcast receiver, and 160m was largely the >Unknown & Barely Usable Ham Band.