Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:07:29 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F166C-0008JR-Lt for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:07:29 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F166C-0008IR-E4 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:07:28 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F165C-0005Uw-Nr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:06:26 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F165C-0005Un-5S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:06:26 +0000 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39] helo=rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F17LR-0006ck-BU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:27:36 +0000 Received: from rmailcenter05.comcast.net ([204.127.197.115]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2006012318055801500gsmjre>; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:05:59 +0000 Received: from [24.91.21.104] by rmailcenter05.comcast.net; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:05:54 +0000 From: Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: "james moritz" Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:05:54 +0000 Message-Id: <012320061805.1968.43D51B01000D5014000007B022007358340B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Aug 4 2005) X-Authenticated-Sender: bWFyeWphbmVib3lkQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 Subject: Re: LF: RE: ZL1BPU QRV X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Jim, Do you have your linear regulator for the Decca written up? I'm particularly interested in how it is interfaced to the serial data comming from the computer. Thanks & 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ FN42hi http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "james moritz" > > ...The transmitter is VERY interesting. Only a few years old, it is a > broadband design, and uses a Class D H-bridge FET transmitter, each 500W > module with its own Class S modulator / power supply adjustable 0 - 130V at > 7A. The modulator has 0 - 4kHz bandwidth, so is AM capable. Anyone for Kahn > EER? ... > > Dear Murray, LF Group, > > Yes, I have been using an envelope elimination and restoration system to > transmit various BPSK modes for some years now. The PA is one of the "Decca" > 1.2kW class D units re-tuned for 136kHz. The HT supply to this is 0-60V, > 0-22A supplied via a modulator that is basically a big series regulator. > Using a linear modulator sounds like a bad idea, but with BPSK the crest > factor of the signal is not very great, and most of the time the PA is > running near full output, so consequently only a modest amount of power is > dissipated in the modulator. The overall efficiency is still around 80%. > Andy, G4JNT, has published a switch-mode modulator design for a class D > amplifier. > > Originally, I used it with VE2IQ's "Coherent" mode, which generates straight > binary data via the serial port. This was used to key a hardware phase > modulator, and, via a waveform-shaping circuit, to generate the envelope for > the amplitude modulator. I have also used it with KK7KA's "Wolf" mode, which > was the first successful transatlantic 136kHz data mode signal. Also I have > used it to generate PSK31 and a slowed-down "PSK08" version, using DL4YHF's > Spectrum Lab software to generate an on-off keyed tone to provide the binary > data. At the moment, I am considering modifying it to obtain envelope and > phase signals from a sound-card generated signal, which should make it more > easily compatible with most data-mode software now around. > > The main problem with the more exotic modes on LF is very few stations are > able to transmit them, and also receiving them is more complicated. The > "visual" modes like QRSS and DFCW are simple to generate, and several > signals can be received at once, without precise frequency calibration, etc. > PSK31 has been tried by several LF stations; it works OK when there is > little QRN, but because there is no error correction, each impulse of static > has a 50% chance of corrupting 1 bit, so it rapidly becomes unreadable when > the QRN builds up, even though the signal may remain quite audible. Since > the European band is only 2.1kHz wide, and some of that is occupied by > utility signals, SSB and the wider data modes are not very practical here! > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > > > > > > >