Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:15:04 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EudNv-0001AB-5M for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:15:03 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EudNu-00019s-Vf for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:15:03 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1EudNj-0006zL-DP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:14:51 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1EudNg-0006zC-Of for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:14:48 +0000 Received: from [63.240.77.84] (helo=sccrmhc14.comcast.net) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EudsS-0005Ex-9Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:46:40 +0000 Received: from AIRPORTTERMINAL (c-67-177-102-19.hsd1.ct.comcast.net[67.177.102.19]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with SMTP id <2006010522134101400sinsse>; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:13:41 +0000 Message-ID: <003001c61247$93208dc0$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> From: "Jay Rusgrove" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <43BD0BA1.1050104@w1tag.com> <000801c611f8$d4f93020$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> <000201c61233$383d2080$14e5fc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:30:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: LF: Re: Re: TA 05 Jan Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Mal

Okay on the QRSS10. You may want to move frequency a bit to get away from CT1DRP since the QRSS10 screen puts you nearly on top of him.

Will blow the cobwebs out of the HF stuff this weekend so we can give the crossband QSO a try. If condx remain good it shouldn't be much of a challange.

Jay

----- Original Message -----

From: hamilton mal

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 11:20 AM

Subject: LF: Re: TA 05 Jan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Rusgrove" <JRusgrove@comcast.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 1:05 PM
Subject: LF: TA 05 Jan

> Much less static and good signal levels...details and captures here:
>
> http://www.w1vd.com/gallery2006.html
>
> Jay, W1VD
Hi Jay
Your recent captures look encouraging especially since I was transmitting at
the higher speeds. Last night I was using QRS10, unfortunately I switched
off too early, just when you hit the right button hi
My normal speed will be qrs 10 or 20 which is more realistic for a potential
qso. We all know from experience over the past few years that qrs 60 and 120
works but it takes too long. I have worked John/VE1JG at qrs 2 in the past
so the faster speeds are possible, in fact with better than average
propagation TR signals would probably be audible.
I am trying to be progressive here and move away from the qrs 60/120 beacon
mode night after night that some others prefer.
I also work 7030 khz cw for feedback at the same time as I am txing on LF.
Call me on there if you can and give me a report, calls also welcome from
anyone that copies my LF signals.
73 and tnx again for your effort and shots.
de Mal/G3KEV