Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:03:39 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Ezjkf-0003st-NC for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:03:39 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Ezjkf-0003m2-J7 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:03:37 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ezjk7-0006lE-CV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:03:03 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ezjk6-0006ky-K6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:03:02 +0000 Received: from smtp803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.140]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Ezkyz-0006Iq-PC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:22:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 26545 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2006 00:02:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?213.122.52.32?) (james.moritz@btopenworld.com@213.122.52.32 with login) by smtp803.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2006 00:02:44 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.375 [267.14.21/235]); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:02:14 +0000 Message-ID: <002b01c61d54$c510aaa0$20347ad5@w4o8m9> From: "James Moritz" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <016101c61d02$12ceca40$2101a8c0@pcroelof> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:02:14 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Subject: LF: Re: Mini Whip and local noise Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Dear Roleof, LF Group, > Most radio amateur textbooks state that qrm from a local noise source is due > to the electric part of the electro-magnetic field and has a vertical > polarisation. An active whip is a vertical antenna and responds mainly to > the electric field. A loop antenna responds to the magnetic field. The > question arises why an active whip is apparently insensitive to vertical > polarised local noise and an active loop is not. > I have often heard this statement, but is there any justification for it at LF? Assuming no resonances occur near the receive frequency, a predominantly electric field QRM source implies a relatively high voltage, low current and high impedance, while a predominantly magnetic field QRM source implies high current, low voltage and low impedance. Most of the QRM experienced at LF seems to be mains related, and most mains wiring must have a fairly low impedance to ground due to the capacitance between wires in cables, so relatively large noise currents and small noise voltages would seem likely. So one would expect predominantly "magnetic" noise from mains wiring. > Before entering the house, the braid of the coaxial feed line of the active > whip is connected to ground. This makes a large difference in received > local noise. An explanation could be the assumption that the shield of the > coaxial feed line is picking up additional local noise, which flows into the > earth when the braid is connected to a ground stake. Trying to confirm this, > the following tests have been performed... > I have found this is often true. I had an amazing level of noise on the old 73kHz band if I grounded the antenna end of the RX antenna feeder, which was largely eliminated by leaving the loop antenna "floating", except where it connected to the RX ground. Something similar happened when I operated with G3GRO from Porthcurno a few years back - we set up a loop well away from sources of QRM with a long feeder, but still got a high noise level. eventually I found the noise was eliminated by raising the loop clear of the long grass and brambles; apparently the vegetation touching the loop antenna element gave enough of a conductive path to complete a ground loop. With a loop antenna, even if the screening of the feeder is perfect, a noise current flowing down the braid will produce a magnetic field that can be picked up by the loop, so really it is neccessary to prevent such noise currents flowing, rather than trying to apply better screening. In general, I find multiple grounding points on feeders are a bad thing from the noise viewpoint. My current RX vertical antenna has an isolating transformer at the antenna to reduce this problem. My RX loops are currently grounded only at the receiver end of the feeders. Also, I have tried to isolate the LF rig from the mains ground by connecting the mains through a filter which includes a choke in the ground line, and providing a seperate RF ground connection. Another source of noise is the TX vertical antenna; when it is resonant at the receiving frequency, it can introduce a lot of noise in the RX antennas, which are practically underneath it, and also "suck out" the wanted signal. This was overcome by adding a relay in series with the "cold" end of the loading coil, which open-circuits the TX antenna on receive, and so de-tunes it. The best tool for investigating these problems is a battery-operated receiver - if there is no noise when the RX is connected directly at the antenna feed point with the normal feeder disconnected, you can be sure that the feeder is the source of the problem. It is also very useful when trying to find a low-noise location to position a loop or whip antenna.. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU