Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:13:31 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EvDsv-0007qJ-1E for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:13:31 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EvDsu-0007pj-T8 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:13:28 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1EvDsg-0004xE-Uj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:13:14 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1EvDsg-0004x5-ID for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:13:14 +0000 Received: from smtp810.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.200]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EvF2u-0003Rs-SV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 14:28:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 60582 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2006 13:12:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO w4o8m9) (james.moritz@btopenworld.com@81.131.106.152 with login) by smtp810.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2006 13:12:52 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.371 [267.14.15/223]); Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:12:32 +0000 Message-ID: <001f01c6138c$04aaf620$986a8351@w4o8m9> From: "James Moritz" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001b01c60f2a$57d5a4a0$80648351@w4o8m9> <002801c60f9c$88e40ec0$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> <000a01c60fb3$dd8ce980$cce4fc3e@l8p8y6> <001b01c60fc1$c1f37320$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> <000901c60ffc$48c541a0$92198351@w4o8m9> <001201c6137d$2619c2a0$53e4fc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 13:12:31 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: TA 2 JAN 06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Dear Mal, LF Group, Yes, that sounds like it. At your QTH, you are considerably further from Rugby and Lessay than stations in SE England, so I would expect the noise level to be considerably lower than it is here. Also, both stations are in roughly the same direction, approximately south from you, so your loop should do a pretty good job of nulling both Lorans. Here, the bearings differ by about 100degrees, roughly NW and SW, so the more complicated noise-cancelling system that I have mentioned before, that phases together a loop and a vertical to get two "steerable" nulls is needed. This is doing quite a good job for stations in directions from 0 to 180 degrees from here, but of course gives a fair amount of cancellation of any wanted signals arriving from the west. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU ----- Original Message ----- From: hamilton mal To: Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:25 AM Subject: LF: Re: Re: TA 2 JAN 06 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Moritz" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 12:26 AM > Subject: LF: Re: TA 2 JAN 06 > > > > Hi Jim. > This past while I have been getting some qrm on 136 especially on my > Vertical antenna being omni, I suspect it must be the Rugby transmitter. I > am getting strong lines spaced at 7.4 hz. It is barely visible on my loop > which is broadside to Rugby and the South. It also sounds like a ckicking > noise. Is this the Rughy qrm that those in the midlands and south are > suffering from? > 73 de Mal/G3KEV > > > > > > > >