Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:17:12 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F0f5i-0001xl-Hw for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:17:12 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F0f5i-0001wh-DX for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:17:10 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F0f50-0004zM-S1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:16:26 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F0f50-0004zD-GN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:16:26 +0000 Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net ([216.148.227.154] helo=rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F0gKo-0006G2-Td for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:37:09 +0000 Received: from JAYTERMINAL (c-67-177-102-19.hsd1.ct.comcast.net[67.177.102.19]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTP id <20060122131601014003pro4e>; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:16:01 +0000 Message-ID: <001501c61f55$fd6b80c0$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> From: "Jay Rusgrove" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001401c61f51$1782d4e0$f500a8c0@Dell5150> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:16:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: LF: Re: RE: TA 22 JAN 06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Dave With Jim's report and yours it all makes sense now...was trying to figure whose call sign had so many M's in it. Congratulations all on the three way! On a quiet night your signal would have been solid O copy. Hope you consider more transmitting in the TA window - can always use more signals to monitor. Jim WD2'XNS' ran test transmissions last night from about 0200 - 0415 at power levels between 10 and 100 watts on 137.781 kHz. Very surprised you saw anything! Thanks for the info. Jay, W1VD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Pick" To: Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 7:40 AM Subject: LF: RE: TA 22 JAN 06 > Jay > > Unknown was me. In exhibit B you get a partial X then the M then two Ms (my > report to Joe) then K. In exhibit C there's most of YXM with the M cut off. > > First T/A reprt for ages! ... Largely because I haven't been on. > > 73 > > Dave G3YXM > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rusgrove > Sent: 22 January 2006 12:23 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: TA 22 JAN 06 > > Higher static levels from approaching cold front and line noise caused by > high winds made for some messy captures. Stations received G3KEV, CT1DRP, > M0BMU and unknown: > > http://www.w1vd.com/gallery2006.html > > Jay, W1VD > > > >