Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:39:04 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EyoEx-0001Ao-Nz for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:39:04 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EyoEx-00015t-HG for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:39:03 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1EyoDs-0000kI-4r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:37:56 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1EyoDr-0000k9-6K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:37:55 +0000 Received: from smtp809.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.199]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EyooG-0007K4-Vu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:15:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 39672 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2006 10:37:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lark) (alan.melia@btinternet.com@213.122.81.75 with login) by smtp809.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2006 10:37:50 -0000 Message-ID: <000a01c61b52$10796fe0$67b0fea9@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000701c61a8f$6ccf2c80$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL><20060116234132.jss0e6ldnj0g0880@webmail.versatel.de><001301c61af4$9db27ae0$67b0fea9@lark> <20060117110042.4fiu7hkxcquscoos@webmail.versatel.de> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:37:29 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Propagation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Uwe, yes it is a bit confusing as at first sight one would expect the signals to be present or absent on both grabbers. At night I think the main mode is a hop length of about 2000 km. See http://www.btinternet.com/~alan.melia/geometry.htm This is about the distance from Brian to DCF39. The night-time signals Brian recorded over several years were fairly consistent but did sometimes show severe dips in strength which I think are due to destructive interference (optical term) between the main mode and other paths (maybe a 2-hop path). The path to the States is roughly 6000kms which is 3 hops, but under conditions of low absorption it may be that a two hop signal (or a 4 hop signal) arrives, sometimes at a very similar strength. The result of this can be deep fades, but the timing does depend on the path length. It is interesting to watch Joe, Warren, John and Dex's signals. In particular although John and Warren are only about 80km apart there is a distinct difference in the times they fade and return....it can be as much as 15 to 20 minutes. The positive side to this effect is that if the phase difference is right you get a 6dB enhancement a short time later in the night. These are the "lifts" that lead to some of the first TA successes on 3 sec dot QRSS (all that was available at the time using Robert Horne's Spectrogram) Interesting stuff this LF propagation !! Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: 17 January 2006 10:00 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Propagation last EU nights my signs could be seen on the CT1BRT grabber in IN51QD ie 2120km/235dgr and at same times my signs where not visible on the screen of W1VD in FN31MS ie 5943 km/293dgr. and vv no signs on the CT1DRP grabber means the signs are visible on the W1VD screen. do you have an explanation? > Zitat von Alan Melia : > > > Hi Uwe was this one meant for me ?? > > Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > > > > yes, Alan, sri for mixing up the callsigns. > > vy 73, Uwe > > >