Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:31:12 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F15X5-0000r8-V6 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:31:12 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1F15X5-0000qE-Qh for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:31:11 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1F15Wj-0005Mw-V6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:30:49 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1F15Wj-0005Mn-8C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:30:49 +0000 Received: from tucana.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.215.113]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F16AC-0007al-Ir for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:11:39 +0000 Received: from [147.197.164.230] (helo=RD40002) by tucana.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1F15WZ-000093-EL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:30:39 +0000 From: "james moritz" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:30:38 -0000 Message-ID: <000001c62042$ba2e1370$e6a4c593@RD40002> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000001c61fe3$3958dc80$06a66dcb@cobaltxp> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-UH-MailScanner-Information: UH-mail X-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected Subject: LF: RE: ZL1BPU QRV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) ...The transmitter is VERY interesting. Only a few years old, it is a broadband design, and uses a Class D H-bridge FET transmitter, each 500W module with its own Class S modulator / power supply adjustable 0 - 130V at 7A. The modulator has 0 - 4kHz bandwidth, so is AM capable. Anyone for Kahn EER? ... Dear Murray, LF Group, Yes, I have been using an envelope elimination and restoration system to transmit various BPSK modes for some years now. The PA is one of the "Decca" 1.2kW class D units re-tuned for 136kHz. The HT supply to this is 0-60V, 0-22A supplied via a modulator that is basically a big series regulator. Using a linear modulator sounds like a bad idea, but with BPSK the crest factor of the signal is not very great, and most of the time the PA is running near full output, so consequently only a modest amount of power is dissipated in the modulator. The overall efficiency is still around 80%. Andy, G4JNT, has published a switch-mode modulator design for a class D amplifier. Originally, I used it with VE2IQ's "Coherent" mode, which generates straight binary data via the serial port. This was used to key a hardware phase modulator, and, via a waveform-shaping circuit, to generate the envelope for the amplitude modulator. I have also used it with KK7KA's "Wolf" mode, which was the first successful transatlantic 136kHz data mode signal. Also I have used it to generate PSK31 and a slowed-down "PSK08" version, using DL4YHF's Spectrum Lab software to generate an on-off keyed tone to provide the binary data. At the moment, I am considering modifying it to obtain envelope and phase signals from a sound-card generated signal, which should make it more easily compatible with most data-mode software now around. The main problem with the more exotic modes on LF is very few stations are able to transmit them, and also receiving them is more complicated. The "visual" modes like QRSS and DFCW are simple to generate, and several signals can be received at once, without precise frequency calibration, etc. PSK31 has been tried by several LF stations; it works OK when there is little QRN, but because there is no error correction, each impulse of static has a 50% chance of corrupting 1 bit, so it rapidly becomes unreadable when the QRN builds up, even though the signal may remain quite audible. Since the European band is only 2.1kHz wide, and some of that is occupied by utility signals, SSB and the wider data modes are not very practical here! Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU