Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:42:05 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Es1mu-0006Ai-5t for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:42:05 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Es1mu-000669-1o for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:42:04 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Es1mI-0002b4-Gp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:41:26 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Es1mH-0002av-Jj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:41:25 +0000 Received: from smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.79]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Es2DZ-0002cC-FY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:09:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 24703 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2005 17:41:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (208.37.242.34) by smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.79) with ESMTP; 29 Dec 2005 17:41:14 -0000 Message-ID: <43B41FC4.8070909@w1tag.com> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:41:24 -0500 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000b01c60c70$576efdc0$0500a8c0@charter.net> <43B4144B.2090003@hifidelity.com> In-Reply-To: <43B4144B.2090003@hifidelity.com> Subject: Re: LF: TA 29 Dec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Steve, We were probably just far enough east of the noise to make a difference. It looks like tonight's conditions will be quite dismal here, though. John A. Steve Dove wrote: > Hi John, > > Congrats to you and Jay; I watched the Loran lines steadily disappear > in the noise, saw how scruffy DCF-39 was looking, and just shrugged. > Nothing on overnight captures. > > Cheers, > > Steve > > > John Andrews wrote: > >> I had about the same results as Jay last night. The best copy of >> CT1DRP was just before 0000 UTC: >> >> M0BMU was identifiable by frequency, but only fragments of the >> callsign could be seen. Here's an "M0" from 0600 UTC: >> > > >