Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:30:17 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1ErisC-0000kA-Mf for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:30:17 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1ErisC-0000jt-IR for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:30:16 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Erirl-0005SU-Qw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:29:49 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Erirl-0005SL-Ei for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:29:49 +0000 Received: from smtpout04-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.199]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ErjId-0007VJ-Sf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:57:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 17026 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2005 21:29:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (208.37.242.34) by smtpout04-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.199) with ESMTP; 28 Dec 2005 21:29:35 -0000 Message-ID: <43B303C1.40706@w1tag.com> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:29:37 -0500 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <43B2E9F4.3030302@w1tag.com> <43B2FFC3.4070200@hifidelity.com> In-Reply-To: <43B2FFC3.4070200@hifidelity.com> Subject: Re: LF: Xmas LF Acty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Steve, > OK - I'm confused, but that's easy as you know. > > Shouldn't that be 136.320 to be on the same screen as 136.318kHz,+/-? Yes, you're right of course. Dave and I aren't too handy with numbers... Sigh..... JA