Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:07:10 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EpTuH-0001WJ-It for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:07:10 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EpTuH-0001W9-Er for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:07:09 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1EpTuA-00037r-Ml for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:07:02 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1EpTuA-00037i-AM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:07:02 +0000 Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.21]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EpUyS-0007DQ-Nh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:15:48 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (a82-92-108-254.adsl.xs4all.nl [82.92.108.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBMH6d1Q098443 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:06:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nl9222@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <43AADD26.9060405@xs4all.nl> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:06:46 +0000 From: "Ko, NL9222" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <43A2404C.7040800@att.net> <001201c603b8$1fdb7660$0100a8c0@jpmpcportable> <000e01c60407$e72ff5c0$36e4fc3e@l8p8y6> <43A5F1EC.6080109@xs4all.nl> <00a001c60716$94659cc0$22e4fc3e@l8p8y6> In-Reply-To: <00a001c60716$94659cc0$22e4fc3e@l8p8y6> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0551-3, 12/22/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl id jBMH6d1Q098443 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: XKO running 1 watt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) hamilton mal wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ko, NL9222" > To: > Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 11:34 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: XKO running 1 watt > > > hamilton mal wrote: > >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Jean-Pierre Méré" >>To: ; "LowFer LWCA" >>Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 9:47 AM >>Subject: LF: Re: XKO running 1 watt >> >> >> >> >>>Hello all on the list ! >>>The last night was very good! I copied VO1NA, WD2XGJ, WD2XKO and WD2XES in >>>Jason???? Attached a screenshot . >>>73 qro Jean-Pierre f1afj JN06ht >> >> >>LF and MF condx excellent at present. Great signals from Asia/UA9 and > > beyond > >>on 160 metres during daytime here in the UK. >>Now is the time for a REAL qso on LF to North America for those > > interested. > >>de Mal chasing dx on 160m. > > > Why bother us with 160 Meters when 136 KHz is to difficult? > > You are correct. I have worked over 200 countries on 160 metres but find it > DIFFICULT to work 200 on 136 khz , however I have worked 30 countries on 136 > khz most on normal CW. > What is your SCORE ? 30 in all possible modes cos i am all purpose not rusted to cw only + cw 319 dxcc on 160 and 287 on 80 all cw, but who gives a shit here on 136 . Did you ever see someone else brag here about something they did? why not put your wonderfull scores on other lists like "Topband Contesting" or the "160m" list, i am sure you are as welcome there as you are here. Wake up, 160 is one other type of band but easier.