Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:04:57 +0000 Received: by pih-mxcore17.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Ej2uf-0007rO-4j for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:04:57 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore17.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Ej2uf-0007r5-03 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:04:57 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ej2tN-0002WS-AX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:03:37 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ej2tM-0002WJ-Mq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:03:36 +0000 Received: from smtp809.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.199]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Ej3rD-0001tz-QW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:05:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 63049 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2005 23:03:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lark) (alan.melia@btinternet.com@213.122.60.59 with login) by smtp809.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2005 23:03:09 -0000 Message-ID: <001801c5f926$688a6160$3b3c7ad5@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 22:59:35 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Subject: LF: Re: QRS.EXE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Gary there is another possibility. I am not sure whether it occurs on your laptop of not but it might be worth a look with a scope. I have a computer (not PC :-)) ) whic is a small 80C85 laptop it does not latch the data to the parallel port, It relies on the printer accepting it when it is declared "valid" by the control pins. The result is you may only get a blip on some of the pins. I would have thought the control pins might be latched but not sure.......I found a lot of noise on the pins between strobe pulses. Probably well wide of the mark but worth looking for as I suspect the use of this method is to keep the power consumption down. The serial port on my machine works fine. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary - G4WGT To: LF (Rsgb LF Group) Sent: 04 December 2005 19:06 Subject: LF: QRS.EXE > Hi All, > > Is there any reason why I can't run DFCW using port LPT1 from my laptop? > Both modes run ok from my desktop PC using serial port. All I have done is > make an adapter from 9 pin serial to 25 pin parallel & that is ok using qrss > mode. > > Regards, > > Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp > > Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor >