Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:24:30 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Eeegm-0000oN-Ka for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:24:29 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Eeegm-0000nD-9s for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:24:28 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Eeeex-0006s1-KO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:22:35 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Eeeew-0006rs-IQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:22:34 +0000 Received: from mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.144]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EefYF-0004eT-SA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:19:45 +0000 Received: from mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.141]) by mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP id <20051122202219.QYQM13239.mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz@mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz> for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:22:19 +1300 Received: from quaycustomer ([210.86.70.131]) by mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz with SMTP id <20051122202218.GRVX1416.mta4-rme.xtra.co.nz@quaycustomer> for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:22:18 +1300 Message-ID: <006001c5efa4$e4eadf40$0600000a@quaycustomer> From: "Vernall" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001c5ef77$d6fdc870$e6a4c593@RD40002> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:39:49 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: LF: Re: RE: BYX10 as LF PIN diode Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi all, Thanks to Jim M0BMU, Alan G3NYK and Mike G8YMB for comments. I agree that incidental use of a diode for other than its intended purpose needs care with verification of the desired incidental use. My evaluation was on a small sample of the red cased BYX10 diodes. I reported my findings on BYX10 tests as an incidental PIN diode as the cost is well under a Euro and fairly available, but there is a risk that a particular batch may not be so co-operative with PIN controlled resistance or have a "cutoff" higher than the LF band of interest. I'm not sure of the cost or availability of a small signal PIN diode designed for LF, and I don't need a transmit rated device for small signal control. If there are other readers who have price and availability information on PIN diodes designed for small signal LF use I would appreciate a reply, even if it is private email. The ALC circuit produced by Mike uses a bipolar transistor shunt, which is high impedance going low when driven. There are other variants of the circuit using a JFET shunt, but that is initial low impedance going high with bias applied. In essence each is a current controlled resistor type of application. My opinion is that a PIN diode (when used in the appropriate frequency range) is the better device for smooth gain control and linearity. I'm not sure of the finer points of intermodulation with any ALC circuit, but in any case intermod in the PA final is likely to be the most demanding part of a linear transmitter to control quality of the emission. 73, Bob ZL2CA