Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:14:18 +0000 Received: by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Eeamd-00073V-1N for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:14:17 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Eeamb-00071W-RW for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:14:14 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1EeamC-0006Lj-Sl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:13:48 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1EeamC-0006La-CX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:13:48 +0000 Received: from smtp808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.198]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EebfQ-0001oQ-7r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:10:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 29566 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2005 16:12:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Main) (Alan.Melia@81.131.73.214 with login) by smtp808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2005 16:12:38 -0000 Message-ID: <001001c5ef7f$913ff4e0$d6498351@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001c5ef77$d6fdc870$e6a4c593@RD40002> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:00:49 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Subject: LF: Re: RE: BYX10 as LF PIN diode Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi all Jim has a fair point about this. The structure of an HV diode is designed to make the depletion layer move far into the bulk material reducing the voltage gradient mV/um to keep it below the ionising (pair production) level. Guard ring structures are diffused in at the surface to reduce the fields and constrain the breakdown into the bulk material. One way to define the structure and maybe similarity of diodes of the same generic type might be to measure the capacitance at a voltage of about 50volt. This would give an indication of how big an area the junction was and how far the depletion layer was being pulled into the "intrinsic material". As an attenuator the "on" impedance needs to be low compared with the circuit impedance but there is still the problem of non-linearity which could produce IM products. I am not sure about this but it may be advantageous to put the diode attenuator in a higher impedance circuit in order to reduce the delta (signal current) compared with the bias current, thus keeping the IMD low. So maybe a 1000 ohm circuit rather than 50ohm. For ALC a potentiometer is required so this is not really a problem. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "james moritz" To: Sent: 22 November 2005 15:17 Subject: LF: RE: BYX10 as LF PIN diode Dear Bob, LF Group, If you have not already seen it, there is a PIN diode handbook available as a pdf file from Microsemi corporation: http://www.microsemi.com/literature/pinhandbook.pdf This is quite informative. There is also a much shorter application note: http://www.microsemi.com/micnotes/701.pdf Microsemi make PIN diodes for high-power HF applications; the app notes suggests they might work well at lower frequency too. I believe high voltage rectifier diodes often work quite well as PIN diodes because they also use the PIN structure to increase the breakdown voltage. The thing you have to be wary of when using devices in an un-intended way like this is that diodes marked "BYX10" and made by different manufacturers, or the same manufacturer at different times, may use different processing to achieve the same performance as a rectifier. This means they will all meet their rectifier specifications, but since the RF PIN behaviour is not specified or tested, they may vary a lot in performance as RF attenuators. This is OK in amateur applications, where it is practical to individually select the diodes for suitability. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Vernall Sent: 22 November 2005 01:03 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: BYX10 as LF PIN diode Hi all, A brief report on some experiments to assess diodes as current controlled resistors (as per PIN diodes) at LF. I'm wanting to develop an ALC circuit for a new LF transmitter and PIN diodes are quite good for gain control using an attenuator circuit. It seems that PIN diodes need thick junctions to work properly at lower frequencies...