Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:08:22 +0100
Message-ID: <BAY102-F24074989098FAB760E1001CF710@phx.gbl>
From: "Laurence KL1X" <hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com>
To: lowfer@lwca.org
Cc: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:07:14 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: digital recordings in Baja  Mexico dl52/dl53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Welll I was suspicious that recording from a hi 8 digital camcorder an audio 
signal not even hard wired to the fr100b would produce poor results from the 
car parked near Highway 1  in Southern Mexico using an E probe in the roof 
-i However after looking at both in frequency resolution and quality and 
running Argo with two screens the results are manifestly "good" (hurrah!!) 
as I replay the first of the tapes tonight

One screen is presently looking at dcf39 on 138.83 and giving good results 
within 0.03 Hz of nominal and Im seeing clearly just as it was live the 
bespoke dcf39 signature. Its at the moment below audible signal but s/n wise 
it looks good....

The other is open in the watering hole and is clearly showing XKO on what 
was my noizy first night of recording at 2245 PDT 12th from San Jose del 
Cabo...its going to be interesting to run the addtional 6 hours of tapes and 
see what turns up.

Nice thing about digital recording on tape>>>> The first night was really 
noizy with Tstorms to my SE so hoping for better things as we progress.


Laurence KL1X/5