Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:00:21 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore13.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1ERb9h-0003lC-2s for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:00:21 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore13.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1ERb9g-0003l4-Uk for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:00:21 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ERb92-0005Yk-Vp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:59:40 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ERb92-0005Yb-K4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:59:40 +0100 Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.142]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ERbot-0001qC-Gl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:42:56 +0100 Received: from [82.68.48.134] (helo=g3ysx.org.uk) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ERb90-0000q3-Pf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:59:38 +0000 Message-ID: <435402AB.7080004@g3ysx.org.uk> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:59:39 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.68.48.134] Subject: LF: Recording of Rugby Loran-C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Has anyone got a recording of the effect of the Rugby Loran-C on the 136KHz band? I am at the International Telecoms Synchronisation Forum where NPL were talking about Loran-C as a possible alternative to GPS for frequency reference. When I asked the speaker about the pollution he said that he thought it was confined to +/- 10KHz, and was quite surprised when I explained about 136KHz. Interestingly someone from the BBC spoke to me afterward and said that there was a problem with interference with Radio4 in the Rugby area, that was attributable to the Loran-C Tx. Anyway, if anyone has a recording I will play it to the NPL speaker to show him what is going on. 73 Stewart