Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:45:01 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EFXZN-00045o-29 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:45:01 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EFXZM-00043W-SW for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:45:00 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1EFXaQ-0002bw-Oz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:46:06 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1EFXaQ-0002bn-6k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:46:06 +0100 Received: from smtp808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.198]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EFYFp-0002Im-5p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:28:57 +0100 Received: (qmail 58552 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 13:45:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Main) (Alan.Melia@81.131.70.135 with login) by smtp808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2005 13:45:55 -0000 Message-ID: <000601c5b932$848f14c0$87468351@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000601c5b922$0e59f410$268cf8d4@standalone> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:44:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Subject: LF: Re: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Andy, I am not up to speed with this these days (I am no doubt someone will chime in with the right gen) but I recollect a value of 7 turns per volt for mains transformer "rule or thumb" design which would be less that 2000 turns on the primary of a mains step-down. What is also the case is that some "cheapy" transofrmers (Altai ??) use as little as 5 turns per volt. These work ok at 60Hz I believe but seem to get hot at 50Hz, even with no load. I would think it unlikely that an economy "wall-wart" would be designed at 20 turns per volt. So maybe your checks were in error ?? Current transformers are available but are quite pricey. I notice that the one in the RS cat shows 8 turn primary for 15A FSD but I guess that depends on the core (toroidal) material. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy" To: Sent: 14 September 2005 12:46 Subject: LF: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here) > Can anyone help with this knotty annoying problem... > > I wanted to make a 50Hz current transformer (CT) to measure the input > current waveform to a SMPSU. I took a small cheap transformer from a wall > mounted PSU of about 6VA rating, and stripped off all the secondary winding > replacing this with one turn of thick wire to form the primary of teh CT. > The old 240V winding had a DC resistance of around 1k, but this should ( ??) > be irrelevant to CT operation > > > The one turn generated about 0.3V RMS from a 240V input, although after some > prolonged testing as a CT, I realised I had got the turns calculation some > way out, but thats by-the-way, (it was actually nearer 5000 than 4000). > That suggested the turns ratio as approximately 4000 turns on the 240V mains > winding. So for a first test, I used a 4k burden resistor with the > intention of obtaining a resultant voltage output of 1Volt / Amp of primary > current. That way, with at the most 10V across it(corresponding to 10A > input) the core must surely be way below saturation so should give good > linearity - shouldn't it !!!. > > BUT, and I don't know how to account for it, there was a very significant > non-linearity . Testing over a range of currents from 0.2A RMS to 9A, the > slope of the Vout / Iin graph shifted by nearly a factor of 2. > > That says 'core saturation' to me, but I don't see how that can be. If > the core is saturating with just 9V across a winding designed for 240V, it > doesn't say a lot for the device in a PSU. Should reducing the value of > the burden resistor help matters? > > Can anyone shed any light on this? I want a good linear current > transformer that will work to 13A RMS that can be used for signal analysis > of the current and voltage waveforms by feeding into an A/D and calculating > what's really happening when fed with typical mains supply inputs. I don't > want to use a massive transformer if that is not essential! > > Andy G4JNT > > >