Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:43:14 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore17.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EFt57-0007Pi-D7 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:43:14 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore17.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1EFt57-0007PW-9N for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:43:13 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1EFt3r-0004nc-EV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:41:55 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1EFt3q-0004nT-Qq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:41:54 +0100 Received: from tucana.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.215.113]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EFtXa-00035X-Ps for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:12:41 +0100 Received: from [147.197.164.230] (helo=RD40002) by tucana.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EFt3h-00038U-2F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:41:45 +0100 From: "james moritz" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:41:44 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c5b9f2$d48dbc90$e6a4c593@RD40002> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000601c5b922$0e59f410$268cf8d4@standalone> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-UH-MailScanner-Information: UH-mail X-UH-MailScanner: No Virus detected Subject: LF: RE: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Dear Andy, LF Group, I believe steel has a B/H curve that is curved at low flux densities as well as high, so you may not need to have much flux to get non-linear effects. But the point is that, provided the current transformer secondary (240V primary in this case) has much higher impedance than the "burden" load resistor, the magnetising current will only be a small fraction of the total current flowing in the load, and so non-linear effects will only cause small errors. Out of curiosity, I measured the primary impedance of some small mains transformers around 6VA lying about at work - they seemed to fall into 2 categories, ones with L > 100H and impedance at 50Hz of several 10s of K or more, and others with L of only 10 - 20H. I've no idea why they should be so different - visually they were very similar, and the DC resistances were similar at several hundred ohms. The impedance of the latter group is only kilohms, so you could expect large errors if your current transformer with 4k load falls into this category. I suppose using a much smaller burden resistor would help, possibly with more primary turns to maintain the scale factor. Another thing is that the windings become parallel resonant somewhere in the kHz range, so I doubt if the bandwidth would be very good if you are expecting very spiky current waveforms. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: 14 September 2005 12:47 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here) Can anyone help with this knotty annoying problem... I wanted to make a 50Hz current transformer (CT) to measure the input current waveform to a SMPSU. I took a small cheap transformer from a wall mounted PSU of about 6VA rating, and stripped off all the secondary winding replacing this with one turn of thick wire to form the primary of teh CT. The old 240V winding had a DC resistance of around 1k, but this should ( ??) be irrelevant to CT operation...