Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:10:44 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore15.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1E3JNy-0000Td-DM for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:10:43 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore15.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1E3JNy-0000TI-2A for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:10:42 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1E3JNv-0004Vf-BB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:10:39 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1E3JNu-0004VW-TC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:10:38 +0100 Received: from mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1E3Jeg-00009r-6Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:28:01 +0100 Received: from [212.139.61.214] (port=3071 helo=tcs01) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1E3JNm-0003ak-9x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:10:30 +0000 From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: "LF \(Rsgb LF Group\)" Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:09:39 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal Subject: LF: Brian CT1DRP, Re: Bounced e-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Brian, Sorry bounced again with that address. Here is the text of that e-mail. Hi Brian, Thank you for the photo & the following e-mails on the subject, some very interesting reading & some over my head (HI. HI.), I notice from your photo that the primary & secondary are not overwound but are separate windings, the GW4ALG design I tried using a monitor line output transformer core was secondary wound over primary, any comments on that? I will proceed to obtain a couple of cores from David (G0MRF). I have now completed the repair to the G0MRF transmitter & I have connected the antenna matching back to the grounded, tapped input coil & the PA mosfets don't get hot as they did before my PA failure when I was using the monitor transformer core, I will try it again on the transformer & note the difference(if any) to see if the matching arrangement has any bearing on this. Thanks again Brian. Regards, Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor