Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:03:31 +0100
Received: by ptb-mxcore14.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1E3VRp-0003Pq-GK 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:03:30 +0100
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	  by ptb-mxcore14.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1E3VRp-0003PY-46 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:03:29 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1E3VRX-0005ev-Bd
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:03:11 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1E3VRW-0005em-Sb
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:03:10 +0100
Received: from mx-out.tiscali.fr ([213.36.80.91] helo=mail.libertysurf.net)
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1E3ViW-0003Nw-Hy
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:20:45 +0100
Received: from jboi0045tiscali (213.36.159.174) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.1.026)
        id 42FABDA70001E872 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:03:04 +0200
Message-ID: <002501c59f1c$6dd7ff60$ae9f24d5@jboi0045tiscali>
From: "F6CWN" <f6cwn@tiscali.fr>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <BAY102-F18B7E4440C9F1950A8F58BCFBC0@phx.gbl>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:01:28 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Subject: Re: LF: NAD amplifier
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00)

12./08/2005   0855z

Thanks Laurence for the infos, fine indeed ( BW 300 KHz!).

 A have find a NAD 2200 amplifier from a old NMR ( nuclear magnetic
resonnance) equipment, probably around 150 KHz.
My question is why not on 136 KHz?
The problem now is to find the shematic diagram and try to pick up some
power...

73: Jeff / F6CWN ( TM5AST also)




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Laurence KL1X" <hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 3:21 AM
Subject: RE: LF: NAD amplifier


> No but can recommend the Hafler P3000 without mods for 137Khz....
>
> 73 Laurence KL1x/5
>
> >From: "F6CWN" <f6cwn@tiscali.fr>
> >Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> >To: "LF/GB" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> >Subject: LF: NAD amplifier
> >Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:50:32 -0000
> >
> >11./08/2005   2046z
> >
> >  Hello LFers,
> >
> >At first, welcome to the new station PA0VHF, fine (........) no, SUPER!
> >
> >
> >
> >  As somebody any experience with the NAD 2200 amplifier (normaly good AF
> >amplifier without output capacitor), like TX on 136 KHz?
> >
> >VY 73: Jeff / F6CWN
> >