Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:28:37 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore11.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DpRw4-0006YV-B4 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:28:36 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore11.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DpRw4-0006Xg-6U for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:28:36 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DpRvi-000064-4O for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:28:14 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DpRvh-00005v-NM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:28:13 +0100 Received: from mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DpRyA-0001E0-NK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:30:49 +0100 Received: from [212.139.62.26] (port=2507 helo=tcs01) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DpRvZ-000IiQ-Pw; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 14:28:05 +0000 From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: "Steve McDonald" Cc: "LF \(Rsgb LF Group\)" Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 15:28:44 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <002b01c5058b$aaf67a00$5911f4cc@p1i5f0> Subject: LF: RE: G0MRF 300w Tx PA mods Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Steve & LF, On 28th January 2005 you included the following statement in your e-mail. ""I think Scott has found that anything over 43V at 15A is getting very scary as the cores will saturate all of a sudden..."" It seems that t has just happened to my PA, although my readings were showing 36 volts at 14 Amps (504 watts), I was testing again & tweaked the volts up a bit from 34 volts at 12 Amps (408 watts), it only stayed on about 30 seconds & failed. During testing after the mods were carried out I bench tested into 50 ohm dummy load & achieved 645 watts so I felt that I could procede a little higher into the antenna, the antenna readings looked fine using Jim's (M0BMU) LF Tuning Meter. So I wonder, was it core saturation?? The core I am using is the original which came with the kit from David (G0MRF). Any thoughts or ideas ?? Regards, Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor -----Original Message----- From: Steve McDonald [mailto:jsm@gulfislands.com] Sent: 28 January 2005 22:50 To: g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk Subject: Re: G0MRF 300w Tx PA mods Gary - it sounds like you are getting similar results as we are with our 'west coast half-killowatt' amps. I am wondering what toroid you are using in the output xfrmr? Both Scott (VE7TIL) and I are using salvaged TV cores which seem to be OK up to a limit...they all appear to be slightly different. I think Scott has found that anything over 43V at 15A is getting very scary as the cores will saturate all of a sudden...be careful with yours and get as much cooling on it as you can. I am thinking of rewinding another output xfrmr with the same turns ratio but with two cores stacked together. Good luck with yours. Steve / VE7SL Web: "THE VE7SL RADIO NOTEBOOK" at http://www.imagenisp.ca/jsm [L.F. Loops] [Tuna Tin DX] [H.F. Maritime DX] [Crystal Radio DXing] [2200m Band] * NEW [CQ Crossband - 2200m To HF] [NDB DX] [Boatanchors] -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 - Release Date: 27/01/2005