Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:04:35 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DpXBC-0000ZN-PJ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:04:35 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DpXBC-0000Z4-Ji for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:04:34 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DpXB1-0000jq-Bj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:04:23 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DpXB0-0000jh-P7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:04:22 +0100 Received: from smtp809.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.199]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DpXHV-0005bk-17 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:11:08 +0100 Received: (qmail 32107 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2005 20:04:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Dell5150) (davepick@btinternet.com@217.43.203.85 with login) by smtp809.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2005 20:04:13 -0000 From: "Dave Pick" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 21:04:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcWA0hJk/Zj5GFY2RleYFcGkzUh2PgAAJMAg Message-Id: Subject: LF: RE: RE: G0MRF 300w Tx PA mods Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Gary That's strange. I would be happier with some 50A FETs, I rather like the IXYS IXFH58N20 but the ones you are using should be OK... I suppose the FETs are well clamped down with not too much heat-sink paste applied? Err... Can't think of anything else but I am puzzled... I've done lots of arcy-sparky tuning up type things with my 1kW transportable TX and it has never blown the FETs. It does however, have the SWR and overcurrent protection set on a knife edge! 73 Dave G3YXM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Gary - G4WGT Sent: 04 July 2005 20:54 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: G0MRF 300w Tx PA mods Dave & Alan, Thanks for your comments, I will try to answer all the questions. Dave wrote :- "Have you any SWR protection on the TX?" - Yes, the G0MRF 300 watt Tx has SWR protection. "Are they 100V devices?" - The Mosfets are STW34NB20, Vdss 200V Id 34A. "It may be that you just momentarily over-Volted the FETs" - The PSU is variac controlled but max volts out is 45V, I increased the voltage from 34V to 36V using the variac, the indications on Jim's LF Tuning Meter were showing no cause for concern, the phase meter needle was very slightly towards positive (not known if it is voltage or current phase error). Alan wrote :- "It is his opinion that problems occur almost entirely due to aerial "effects". Unfavourable reactance / impedances can lead to very high voltages appearing across the FETs" - I anm beginning to believe that this is the problem area. "You mentioned that you have had some "arcing" or corona effects" - The arcing I mentioned was with the previous antenna & I have taken steps to remedy that. "unless your cores are getting very hot" - The blown air exiting from the case is always cool indicating that nothing is heating up inside. I will have to order some replacement mosfets, then I will take additional steps to confirm that the antenna is ok. My original feed arrangement was using a monitor line output transformer core for a matching transformer which I think was saturating because it got quite warm & the antenna current would not increase beyond about 1.6 amps no matter how much power I threw at it. I now use a smaller grounded coil (110mm dia) on the input to the main loading coil (280mm dia) & tap up that, using that method I was able to achieve the best match ever since experimenting on LF with the aid of the transmitters built in SWR meter & Jim's LF Tuning Meter. I will post findings as I progress. Regards, Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor