Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:55:48 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DpXyi-0006h8-Mc for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:55:48 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DpXyi-0006gz-IA for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:55:44 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DpXyE-0000qn-8M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:55:14 +0100 Received: from [82.108.183.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DpXyD-0000qe-DK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:55:13 +0100 Received: from outbound05.telus.net ([199.185.220.224] helo=priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DpXyA-00030Q-Vx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:55:13 +0100 Received: from cognizant1 ([64.180.173.28]) by priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id <20050704205459.YVPV21432.priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net@cognizant1> for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:54:59 -0600 Message-ID: <00a001c580da$fc046720$0201a8c0@private.network> From: "Scott Tilley" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 13:57:26 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: RE: G0MRF 300w Tx PA mods Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Gary Usually core saturation will cause the over current protection to trip and save the finals... I figure you have an SWR problem... I haven't had time to read the thread forming but that seems like to cause of concern... I have run my variant of the G0MRF amp at over 600W in the 41V region for months at a time with no problems until the SWR went crazy... ZAPP! and off to the bench you'll go... If you can use an SWR protection circuit or a loading arrangement that causes the system to fail gracfully, I found link coupling does jut that here so when it rains or snows the power drops off and SWR failures don't happen... Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: "Steve McDonald" Cc: "LF (Rsgb LF Group)" Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 7:28 AM Subject: LF: RE: G0MRF 300w Tx PA mods > Hi Steve & LF, > > On 28th January 2005 you included the following statement in your e-mail. > > ""I think Scott has found that anything over 43V at 15A is getting > very scary as the cores will saturate all of a sudden..."" > > It seems that t has just happened to my PA, although my readings were > showing 36 volts at 14 Amps (504 watts), I was testing again & tweaked the > volts up a bit from 34 volts at 12 Amps (408 watts), it only stayed on about > 30 seconds & failed. > > During testing after the mods were carried out I bench tested into 50 ohm > dummy load & achieved 645 watts so I felt that I could procede a little > higher into the antenna, the antenna readings looked fine using Jim's > (M0BMU) LF Tuning Meter. So I wonder, was it core saturation?? > > The core I am using is the original which came with the kit from David > (G0MRF). > > Any thoughts or ideas ?? > > Regards, > > Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp > > Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve McDonald [mailto:jsm@gulfislands.com] > Sent: 28 January 2005 22:50 > To: g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk > Subject: Re: G0MRF 300w Tx PA mods > > > > Gary - it sounds like you are getting similar results as we are with our > 'west coast half-killowatt' amps. I am wondering what toroid you are using > in the output xfrmr? Both Scott (VE7TIL) and I are using salvaged TV cores > which seem to be OK up to a limit...they all appear to be slightly > different. I think Scott has found that anything over 43V at 15A is getting > very scary as the cores will saturate all of a sudden...be careful with > yours and get as much cooling on it as you can. I am thinking of rewinding > another output xfrmr with the same turns ratio but with two cores stacked > together. Good luck with yours. > > Steve / VE7SL > > Web: "THE VE7SL RADIO NOTEBOOK" at http://www.imagenisp.ca/jsm > [L.F. Loops] [Tuna Tin DX] [H.F. Maritime DX] [Crystal Radio DXing] > [2200m Band] * NEW [CQ Crossband - 2200m To HF] [NDB DX] [Boatanchors] > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.1 - Release Date: 27/01/2005 > >