Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:02:06 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore18.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DvcYm-0002ek-NM for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:02:06 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore18.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DvcYm-0002eT-HM for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:02:04 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DvcYK-0002HZ-5Y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:01:36 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DvcYJ-0002HQ-5J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:01:35 +0100 Received: from ns1.switchnet.com ([209.59.197.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Dvch9-0002a9-4d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:10:45 +0100 Received: from [207.190.154.146] (helo=w2ksn) by ns1.switchnet.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1DvcXK-0008Hb-NL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:00:34 -0700 Message-ID: <007b01c58e05$2a9621f0$1101a8c0@w2ksn> From: "Stewart Nelson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001c58dee$2f258c90$e6a4c593@RD40002> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:02:02 -0700 Organization: SC Group MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns1.switchnet.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - blacksheep.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - scgroup.com Subject: Re: LF: Combatting Loran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi John and all, Is the cave TX using a loop (wire or earth)? If so, I would expect the cave signal to be mostly magnetic, so an electric LORAN antenna, e.g. 1 m whip, would pick up little cave signal, even if it is in the vicinity. I would guess that since you are in the middle of nowhere, other noise should not be a problem, unless it's from your own gear! However, it may take some work to achieve good cancellation over the required bandwidth. Regards, Stewart KK7KA ----- Original Message ----- From: "james moritz" To: Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 5:17 AM Subject: RE: LF: Combatting Loran > Jim, >Do you think this approach would be worth trying at the surface station of a > cave radio link? > Regards, > John G3PAI Dear John, LF Group, What you need to make this kind of scheme work is two antennas which have different relative amplitudes and/or phases of the wanted and unwanted signals. This allows you to adjust the amplitude and phase of one antenna output to cancel the unwanted signal from the other, but without at the same time cancelling the wanted signal. If you can arrange an auxiliary receiving antenna that picks up the Loran noise without picking up much of the cave radio signal, the system should work. I imagine this would be fairly easy due to the "near field" nature of the cave radio signal - just putting the auxiliary antenna further away from the cave radio TX should do the trick. Note that other noise sources present at either antenna generally will add rather than cancel in the combined output, so it is important that the additional antenna has a good SNR (or Loran noise/Other noise Ratio might be a better way of putting it) if you expect to improve the overall SNR. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU