Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:50:52 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore18.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DyvU2-0003bw-Qk for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:50:52 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore18.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DyvU2-0003bg-JU for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:50:50 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DyvTR-0002rx-Bu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:50:13 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DyvTN-0002ro-PQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:50:09 +0100 Received: from lmfilto02.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.66]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DyvmV-0007xD-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:09:57 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lmfilto02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDA6160A3C for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:49:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.111]) by localhost (lmfilto02.st1.spray.net [212.78.202.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32322-10 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:49:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from urban (unknown [213.204.141.9]) by lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0F912E6 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:49:55 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <000a01c59530$0200c1a0$098dccd5@urban.ekholm> From: ekholm.urban@spray.se To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:55:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at spray.net Subject: SV: LF: LF Activity, lack of Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hello all ! More on lack of activity.......... I have on the reflector suggested (three times) that we should concentrate on specific activity times instead of everybody calling randomly in vain. I suggested this two or three years ago after having gone to the summer-QTH a lot of times (wintertime) and there calling NUMEROUS CQ:s, hearing absolutely nothing ! (I cannot be QRV from home due to lack of space and also very high QRM-levels making it impossible to hear anything but the strongest ones , OH1TN, YU7AR and some more). The first time the response was that the band is rather busy (!) so special activity times is not necessary !!!! The second and third times have given absolutely no response !! I have also mailed the LF-editor of RadCom and suggested that we concentrate on specific activity times. No response !! Anyone interested in more activity on 136, or are all totally satisfied trying to hear meaningless messages across "the water" ? 73 SM5EUF / Urban -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Ko Versteeg Till: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Datum: den 30 juli 2005 16:06 Ämne: Re: LF: LF Activity, lack of >CHRISTOPHER OSBORN wrote: >> It's not entirely correct that there's zero LF activity at present. >> Most weekends I put out several CQ's, if not exactly expecting a reply then at least to give the would-be LF operator something to tune in to. >> >> I've been calling unsuccessfully this morning for ages, albeit with my humble 90 watts and 40 metre aerial ! >> Chris G3XIZ > >Chris & Group > >That's Right, Also heard this morning were >DL2HRE 549, DK4U 529 ,PA0WFO 559 G3XIZ 559 > >73 de Ko, NL9222 > > >