Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:35:35 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore07.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DdkEm-0004So-T3 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:35:35 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore07.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DdkEm-0004SB-Oj for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:35:32 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DdkDx-0001Dy-Px for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:34:41 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DdkDw-0001Dp-SV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:34:40 +0100 Received: from mail.uk.thalesgroup.com ([194.128.85.6] helo=crawsmail1.uk.thalesgroup.com) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DdkGf-0005ri-Aa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:37:30 +0100 Received: from mail.uk.thalesgroup.com (lisc0021.int.rdel.co.uk) by crawsmail1.uk.thalesgroup.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.14) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:34:30 +0100 Received: from temps153538.tms-ltd.com ([193.150.182.142]) by mail.uk.thalesgroup.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j527YUJ3021761 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:34:30 +0100 Received: by temps153538.tms-ltd.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:34:30 +0100 Message-ID: <8E8D23D235D70840B6582917DF2789800240AE@temps153538.tms-ltd.com> From: Reeves Paul To: "'rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org'" Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:34:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Subject: LF: RE: Re: RE: RA1792 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Mal, I'm not exactly the most active person on this group, being rx only at this stage (and very shaky cw!), but I cannot resist joining in on this topic. The RA1772/1792 receivers are arguably considerably superior to almost all amateur grade receive systems available today, despite their age. Sure, they need some care but the components are easily available, unlike the SMT/VLSI based amateur gear. The RF performance in terms of dynamic range is comparable (I concede improvements in technology, but these have only managed to equal 30 yr old designs). The oscillator phase noise and stability is certainly better than more recent gear and the filtering is also better - and if the optional phase corrected filters were fitted then one of the DSP plus points goes away. The ergonomics are definitely superior but, ok, you do need a 19" rack! DSP filtering in the recent amateur gear is, in any case, implemented at a very low IF (barely above audio) and equivalent filtering, or, better, more sophisticated processing (correlation, error detection etc) could easily be added outboard of one of the older receivers. Since this processing would end up as something like WOLF, ARGO, etc I don't expect you to quite agree with me ;-) I would certainly like these rxs to be 300 euro (or less) but they are still MUCH less than the amateur 'equivalent'and, I think, good value. 73s Paul g8gja -----Original Message----- From: hamilton mal [mailto:g3kev.ham@virgin.net] Sent: 01 June 2005 06:27 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: RE: RA1792 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alberto di Bene" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:16 PM Subject: LF: RE: RA1792 > hamilton mal wrote: > > >Alberto I know you are waiting for my opinion about this RX. I would not buy > >this old technology with degraded components at the prices that suppliers > >are asking both in the UK and other parts of EU. > >The price for such a Rx would be about 300 Euro max and even then its a risk > >from the maintainence end. > >The price that dealers in the UK are quoting for this old heap would buy you > >a nice new dedicated T/RCVR for the amateur bands and more than stable for > >data modes for use on LF and a quarter the size. > >Think about it!!!!!! > >de Mal/G3KEV > > > Hello Mal, > > a voice outside the choir ! It's always interesting to hear opinions > dissenting from those of the others, as they can convey new information. > So what you are suggesting to me is to negotiate the price down to about > one half of what has been requested... I am sure to be able to > obtain a price reduction, as, knowing who is the seller, his first word > rarely is his last. But 50% discount seems a bit too much... > I don't need a transceiver, I have already a Kenwood TS-950SDX which I > like a lot. What I am in search of, is a dedicated receiver > for my intended useage. Will keep im mind your opinion, thanks for it. > > 73 Alberto I2PHD Hi Alberto. It has already been pointed out that these Receivers are 15-20 years old and in my opinion a RX that old is not worth more than around £200 ie Euro 300 approx, in fact £100 would be more than enough. The specification for the RX is good but AGE is against it !!! There are more high tech and advanced creatures about these days, with Digital filtering etc better suited for your job. 73 de Mal and definitely not in the Choir or a Gang nor being lead by the nose!! > > >