Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:05:45 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dl0Ey-0007Hl-OA for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:05:45 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dl0Ey-0007DL-Jy for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:05:44 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Dl0EU-0006k9-0i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:05:14 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Dl0ET-0006k0-Dp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:05:13 +0100 Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.231]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Dl0Eu-000189-U7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:05:42 +0100 Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dl0ER-0006hq-00 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:05:11 +0100 Received: from john-b5a82ea1a4 (40-084.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.40.84]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j5M8570b018341 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:05:10 +0100 Message-ID: <200506220904570966.1500E2FD@mail.zetnet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <001b01c576fa$70014480$2101a8c0@AUG2004> References: <75.47bd14e9.2fe9e06d@aol.com> <001b01c576fa$70014480$2101a8c0@AUG2004> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (K) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:04:57 +0100 From: "John Rabson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: LF: Re: LORAN Rugby testing again Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) If anybody has any estimates (or measurements) of the increase in signal strength to be expected in the following areas they would be of considerable interest to the cave radio fraternity: South Wales, Derbyshire (Peak District), the far west and north west of Yorkshire (the area where they sometimes have Lancashire postcodes!!). John G3PAI Cave Radio & Electronics Group *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 22/06/2005 at 08:17 Walter Blanchard wrote: >Markus, >Yes, saw it myself this time. It only added about 4 dB amplitude in a 10 >kHz bw and I couldn't see much difference in sidebands at 137 kHz. >Rugby and Lessay are very roughly the same distance from me. >You might have a look at relative amplitudes - I haven't got a working >Loran-C rx at the moment. >Will have another look today. >Walter G3JKV. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: MarkusVester@aol.com > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 10:28 PM > Subject: LF: LORAN Rugby testing again > > > Dear Group, > > a second LORAN-C transmission from Rugby (GRI 6731-Y, 27.3 ms delay) >occured today between about 8:30 and 16:10 UT. > > Sorry for the a posteriori reporting - I suppose real-time uploads of >LORAN traces might be more useful, but the second computer used for >monitoring on 100 kHz currently cannot be connected to the internet. The >corresponding lines on the LF screengrabber (eg 135923.340 Hz, mostly from >Sylt) did not show any significant change, but at a distance of 923 km not >much effect would be expected here. > > 73 and best wishes > > Markus, DF6NM