Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:43:16 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DiDZL-0007fZ-WB for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:43:16 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DiDZL-0007fB-Qq for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:43:15 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DiDYR-0008TL-0N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:42:19 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DiDYQ-0008TC-B0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:42:18 +0100 Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.231]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DiDYV-0002Br-B7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:42:24 +0100 Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DiDYN-00074w-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:42:15 +0100 Received: from john-b5a82ea1a4 (40-071.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.40.71]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j5EFg7DI025099 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:42:14 +0100 Message-ID: <200506141641370293.5C4D16C7@mail.zetnet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <191.413b8a26.2fdf76f0@aol.com> References: <191.413b8a26.2fdf76f0@aol.com> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (K) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:41:37 +0100 From: "John Rabson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re[2]: LF: Re: Unwanted LF radiation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) In the 1970s, copper was so expensive that aluminium was used in telephone cables. Providing a reliable joint between the copper pair and an aluminium one was interesting. John G3PAI *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 13/06/2005 at 19:55 G4gvw@aol.com wrote: >AND to add to it all ! I am not an ex-BT man (but as Alan NYK will attest > >have worked within the system) It is not unknown for strange effects to be > >manifest at points where the copper network changes into other >manifestations >including different metallic elements as conductors and/or transformations >to or >from optical fibre etc.etc. > >Try checking around street cabinets and large "manhole" covers emblazoned >with the logos of telecoms and utility companies (don't just look at >Bravo-Tango). > >As the old maps used to say "there be dragons" ! > >Pat g4gvw