Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:53:02 +0100 Received: by pih-mxcore17.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DdXOm-0001xL-PZ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:53:02 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore17.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DdXOm-0001ww-KK for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:53:00 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DdXNl-0000My-Ud for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:51:57 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DdXNl-0000Mp-C3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:51:57 +0100 Received: from fh1024.dia.cp.net ([64.97.168.34] helo=n068.sc1.cp.net) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DdXQC-0005Yz-H1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:54:29 +0100 Received: from l8p8y6 (62.252.232.217) by n068.sc1.cp.net (7.0.043) id 4291A94A00381F2E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:51:53 +0000 Message-ID: <002b01c56678$2ef76100$d9e8fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4298D673.7020308@usa.net> <002301c56449$31f11300$ecac8351@w4o8m9> <6.1.0.6.2.20050529205736.02814360@mbox.spin-it.com> <429B1EE1.1070605@usa.net> <000501c565bb$65c49940$f8e8fc3e@l8p8y6> <429CB81B.7070604@usa.net> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:26:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Subject: LF: Re: RE: RA1792 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alberto di Bene" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:16 PM Subject: LF: RE: RA1792 > hamilton mal wrote: > > >Alberto I know you are waiting for my opinion about this RX. I would not buy > >this old technology with degraded components at the prices that suppliers > >are asking both in the UK and other parts of EU. > >The price for such a Rx would be about 300 Euro max and even then its a risk > >from the maintainence end. > >The price that dealers in the UK are quoting for this old heap would buy you > >a nice new dedicated T/RCVR for the amateur bands and more than stable for > >data modes for use on LF and a quarter the size. > >Think about it!!!!!! > >de Mal/G3KEV > > > Hello Mal, > > a voice outside the choir ! It's always interesting to hear opinions > dissenting from those of the others, as they can convey new information. > So what you are suggesting to me is to negotiate the price down to about > one half of what has been requested... I am sure to be able to > obtain a price reduction, as, knowing who is the seller, his first word > rarely is his last. But 50% discount seems a bit too much... > I don't need a transceiver, I have already a Kenwood TS-950SDX which I > like a lot. What I am in search of, is a dedicated receiver > for my intended useage. Will keep im mind your opinion, thanks for it. > > 73 Alberto I2PHD Hi Alberto. It has already been pointed out that these Receivers are 15-20 years old and in my opinion a RX that old is not worth more than around £200 ie Euro 300 approx, in fact £100 would be more than enough. The specification for the RX is good but AGE is against it !!! There are more high tech and advanced creatures about these days, with Digital filtering etc better suited for your job. 73 de Mal and definitely not in the Choir or a Gang nor being lead by the nose!! > > >