Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:47:43 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore13.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DkSFC-0005SY-9I for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:47:43 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore13.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DkSFC-0005SR-5z for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:47:42 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DkSEd-0003G1-NY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:47:07 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DkSEd-0003Fs-3M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:47:07 +0100 Received: from fh1024.dia.cp.net ([64.97.168.34] helo=n068.sc1.cp.net) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DkSHB-0007XJ-4h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:50:15 +0100 Received: from l8p8y6 (62.252.228.12) by n068.sc1.cp.net (7.0.043) id 4291A94A00956A16 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:05:05 +0000 Message-ID: <001b01c572a6$ea0d3980$0ce4fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:08:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Subject: LF: TM0AST Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Hi All
The callsign that I read was TM0AST and not TM5AST. Which is correct ??
de G3KEV